Just a brief note to say CHEERS to Odell for 1) Not calling Loose Leaf a "session IPA; 2)for acknowledging the love and going year-round with it (YAY!); and 3) doing so on Session Beer Day!
Thanks, Odell Brewing! That gets it. As one person said today, "Whatever. If it says "Odell" on it, I'm drinking it."
Congratulations!
Monday, April 7, 2014
Why I called Sierra Nevada "wieners" about their Nooner Session IPA
Heh, heh. It says Nooner. 4.8%? Really? Come on, SN! Can't get it down to 4.5? Wieners...
That's what I put up on Untappd* two days ago as my "review" of Sierra Nevada's new "session IPA," Nooner. If I felt really bad about it, or that I was out of line, I'd apologize. This is Sierra Nevada, after all; a brewery and a founder, Ken Grossman, which I honestly revere(and still do), one of a small pantheon of people and companies who can honestly be said to have started or substantially advanced what we generally call craft brewing.And on Saturday, I called them "wieners."
I don't intend to apologize, because I think I'm right. But I do intend to explain, beyond saying, 'well, you know, I was pretty well into the day at that point, pints of draft, some whiskey, and maybe I was a little jovial.' Which I was, but I stand with Papa Hemingway on this: 'Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.' Or not. Yeah, I had been drinking, but I'm sticking by what I said, and here's why.
"Session IPA" is becoming a selling point, but it's an ill-defined "style" (and yes, that word bugs me some days, but let's work with it for now) at best. Look at the Smuttynose Bouncy House I just posted about earlier today: 4.3%, and they sidestepped the "session IPA" label. Their beer is a hoppy pale ale, but that's not why they didn't call it a session IPA. They did it because they thought it might be a played-out trend in a couple years.
I agree, and that's why, as I said in an interview with the good people at Craft Beer Cellar, the 4.5% bright line is important:
...not so much because of the alcohol. It’s because of the worth of the label. If “session beer” just means “as little as 0.1% ABV less than ‘regular beer’”, it starts to lose meaning. Session beer has to be significantly less than a regular beer in alcohol content. 4.5% is 10% less alcohol than 5.0%; that’s significant. I want it to mean something, and to continue to mean something, so I’m going to be picky.
We weren’t picky about what “craft beer” meant — Is it about who makes it? What it’s made of? What it tastes like? — or what an IPA is (it’s apparently anything someone chooses to call an IPA), and those terms are losing value. I don’t want that to happen to session beer, so I’m using every bit of influence I’ve earned over 20 years of writing about beer to try to fence it off. Making 4.5% a bright line and calling any brewer — like Sierra Nevada, even — to task who calls their beer “session” when it’s more than that, is part of the job. I’ll take flak. There will be backlash. Okay. It’s worth it. This was thankless in the beginning; I can handle it.
Maybe I wouldn't have called Sierra Nevada "wieners" if I hadn't been drinking, but...hey, they called it 'Nooner' first! So I'm not completely off there.
I'm actually getting more concerned about the lame groupthink and sheep mentality represented by "session IPA," especially since it's Sierra Nevada. I really expected something better from a brewer that has produced an iconic, leading Pale Ale, Barleywine, American Stout. I expected a brilliant Bitter, a fearless Mild. But we got a following beer from a brewer that's a leader. I expect better.
I expect better from the whole industry. I should be happy on Session Beer Day, and to some extent, I am! It's great, we're seeing a LOT more session strength beers from notable brewers, and more and more of them at brewpubs. But...an unending parade of "session IPA"?
GOD DAMN IT, AMERICAN BREWERS! You're BETTER than this! And I'm not just talking about session. American craft brewing has become a pathetic nation of followers. Look, a sour sold, let's make one! Look, session IPA sold, let's make one! Look, limited edition beers sold, let's make one! I weep for you. Truly. Show some balls, at least come up with your own name, like "fractional IPA."
I think it's significant that the brewer who's become something of the standard-bearer for the Session Beer Project, Chris Lohring at Notch, said this about his own session-strength IPA, Left of the Dial:
So, after all that, how does it taste? Like an IPA, but without any cloying sweetness and booze that fatigues and gets in the way of multiple pints and extended good times. Call it a Session IPA if you want, but to me it’s simply the IPA I’d like to drink, and I think Notch fans would like to drink.Which makes me think of his Notch Pils; it's not a good session pilsner, it's a good pilsner. So if your beer is a good IPA, call it an IPA. If it's a pale ale...say so. And if it's a bitter, well, God bless you.
Here's hoping for a better selection next year. Now get out there: still plenty of time to get some rounds in. That's where I'm headed. Cheers! Drink small, drink often!
*And thanks so much for not dropping a Session Beer Day badge on us this year, Untappd. I know, I know, we don't have the money to pay you, and those badges cost you...no, wait, they don't cost anything, they're virtual. What the hell, Untappd?
Smuttynose Bouncy House interview
Smuttynose is coming out with a new 4.3% session beer called Bouncy House; it fits into the "session IPA" slot, but they're calling it an "All Occasion American Ale." I talked to Smuttynose brewer David Yarrington about it.
Fun name, Bouncy House. And I see you call it Bouncy House IPA, but the term "session IPA" is nowhere on the packaging.
It was named by Peter [Egleston]. We went back and forth about that. The decision was to just call
it "All Occasion American Ale." In our marketing, we’ll tell people it’s a
session IPA, but we wanted to design a beer that wasn’t just a fad, a beer a year
from now, people will say, 'Oh, session IPA.' Even using IPA on the label was a
back and forth. But anything we can do to stop confusion is good. People
like fanciful names! Look at some of the beers people are talking about, they
have an interesting name.
It’s a session IPA; the term people recognize, being a new
style, how do you define it, and has it been defined? Isn’t it just an
American pale ale?
We wanted to differentiate from that. There’s a fine line
because it’s so low in alcohol and has such a thin body, it can become too
bitter. We’re trying to push that line so it’s more than a pale ale. It’s
hop-forward. A big part is the low ABV, it’s sessionable. [Oh that word!] When we did pilots,
it came down about half a degree Plato in each batch. We wanted to get it in the
4.2-4.3% ABV range, but still have enough mouthfeel.
The last sample you sent me was at 4.6%, and I chided you about it; that's when I was told you were aiming below 4.5%, and this was a work in progress, looking at malt. What did you wind up with on mashbill?
The mashbill is our silo malt, an English pale, then Aromatic, Crystal
60, and Cara Hell. We wanted to add — the specialty malts are over 10% — more
mouthfeel, didn’t want it to be thin, and a little color. We weren’t doing a
hi-gravity beer; it starts at 10 P, so we wanted some complexity. Bittering is
Magnum, we do a lot of Magnum. Flavoring is Calypso, aroma is a mix of Calypso
and Saphir. We don’t know how much it’s going to sell, but we had to contract
last year…and it appears that I cornered the market on Calypso! They asked me
to release some of that back into the wild… Hey, look at me, I’m one of those guys who bought
all the hops! But one of the effects of being as big as we are is that when I think about a new beer, [I have to consider]; if it catches on, am I using a
hop that I can get enough of? Everyone wants Citra; what if it takes off? That’s
why we like to blend dry hops, we could adjust it a bit if we had to. All those
practical things the beer-drinking public doesn’t think about.
Would you have made a beer like this five years ago?
Interesting question. For me, there
was always a desire… at some point in the evening, I’d take a High Life.
Charlie Papazian has been vocalizing for session for a long time. But five years ago,
could I sell it? People weren’t buying. I thank Charlie for advocating these
beers. It would have been hard to sell this five years ago; people were talking
about the proof of beers at the time! People were
eating it up. If I were running a brewpub, that would be different, 7 barrels
would sell out. But Smuttynose is at a different scale.
One of the things I find fascinating is that we’re all aging
at the same rate. We all came in when we were younger and could consume a lot.
But the vanguard of the industry is aging. I’m in my mid-40s, and I’m not the
guy out there drinking 10 pints. It’s nice to have a choice to have a session,
have a few beers, chat with people, and still get up and go to work in the
morning. It dovetails in with a movement I’m starting to see to German beers. I
think you’re going to see more of the lighter helles and kölsches; difficult to brew,
but they have a delicacy and complexity. I think that’s going to mesh well with the
session beer idea.
Making an imperial stout is easier than making these beers.
We’ve all matured past saying that more alcohol
and more flavor means more craft. I love dialing in a smaller beer, they show
their imperfections. I don’t remember seeing beer snobs in the 1990s, but now,
some of these places and people...wow. What I liked was that for five or six dollars
you could have the best beers in the world. I like wine, but I’d never be able
to afford to be a wine snob! I thought that was part of the appeal. But now
this seems to be part of the beer snob.
We're told we don't have a beer culture here in America. Could craft session beers change that?
For years, anyone who came back from England said; wow great
time, drink those beers, and have a great time drinking in the pubs. I went,
and I totally get what they’re talking about. They’re easy, anyone could sit
there all evening. It’s so well-suited for having conversation and a few beers.
I hope that’s what we’re moving to. It’s interesting to see other beer cultures
and how they go about it. America still has some of that bingeing, some of that
Prohibition feeling of ‘this isn’t right, so I better get it done.’ You don’t
want people to see you drinking, and that’s a shame. I spent some time in
Japan, and one of the things I love is that it’s always shared. You buy a large
format bottle for the table, and you don’t pour your own beer; you top off
other people’s. It’s a group experience.
Thanks, David. Happy Session Beer Day!
Labels:
interviews,
new session beers,
Session Beer Day,
Smuttynose
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)