The folks at
NERAX asked me to come speak to their industry session last Friday afternoon. I'd never been to the New England Real Ale eXhibition, and it was a chance to see Thomas (and they offered to throw me a room), so I jumped on it.
NERAX is a 15 year thing, a
unique event that takes place in a
VFW hall about the size of two double-bay garages. It's determinedly low-tech (as befits a cask festival), but the beer's tremendous -- they pour about 90 British and American cask beers (and a few ciders), all
in beautiful condition -- and the food is barbecue sammiches from Redbones. You pay to get in, and you pay for your beer, but you can get 1/4, 1/2 or full imperial pints; your choice. Awesome. You know how good it is?
Paul Pendyck from the Bulls Head in Lititz was there Friday afternoon...and he had his own cask event the next day back home. He flew up and back on Friday because he wasn't going to miss NERAX.
 |
| Deep Ellum's Max Toste and Chris "The Notch" Lohring at NERAX |
Naturally I said I'd speak on session beer, and how cask is a natural expression for it. After getting in Thursday (and not making it to that night's NERAX session because I, well, got to drinking at
Cambridge Brewing and just didn't feel like leaving; more about that at my other blog soon), I got in a bunch of work in my room Friday morning, and headed over to Davis Square to make the 1:00 opening. What a prime crew! Tons of New England brewers (I'd already run into Paul Davis at my hotel), and the NERAX folks (very friendly), Paul Pendyck (we ran out for lunch at a nearby diner),
Chris Lohring (
The Notch), my colleague
Andy Crouch, and the
BeerAdvocate Brothers,
Jason and Todd Alström.
And all those casks. I chatted politely for as long as I could
stand it, then excused myself to get a beer. I had -- that I can recall --
Portsmouth Whipper Snapper, Wachusett Black Shack Porter, Brains SA, Breconshire Cribyn, Meantime Yakima Red, Bray's Old Church Pale, and
Gritty's Blue Porter...I think that was it. Half-pints, over three hours, and most under 4.5%. All very nice, though the Whipper Snapper and the Blue Porter stick out. I got a few in, filled up with the Yakima Red, and hung out in the foyer as I was introduced. Chris Lohring was there, and I asked him if he was
available for tagging when I got into the
cage match with the
Alströms: he said he'd be on the turnbuckle waiting -- then grinned and noted that it was the first time he'd said the word "turnbuckle" in years.
The idea was to do what the Session Beer Project is all about:
stimulate discussion. I got up there, talked about what session beer was and wasn't, and
why I set my ABV number at 4.5% -- and why I was
reluctant to set a limit -- and what session beer was and wasn't in the U.S., and how I'd be happy with another, better
name for it, and ways to make session beer interesting (cask being a big one, of course)...and it was all stuff they
pretty much knew, although the parts about how well session-strength beers are
selling around Philly seemed to make them pretty happy.
Then things went off: I brought up the
price issue. In a nutshell: session-strength beers cost less to make than "normal" strength craft beers -- say, 6% ABV beers -- but only a little: every cost is the same except for a small amount of materials costs, and
maybe shorter aging time. The brewers nodded in agreement when I asked them if it was fair to say it was
about a nickel a pint less, or about six bucks a half-keg. Now, you're talking about a keg of craft beer that's up in the neighborhood of $130 to $170, retail, less than that to the bar...six bucks cheaper? Even if it's
ten bucks cheaper: the bar's going to
charge the same for both beers, because "pint" prices generally increase in 50 cent increments...if you're lucky, and they don't jump by a buck. I'm running that, and
the brewers are all nodding.
But the punters and the pundits weren't buying it. Andy and The Brothers were saying that it should be less anyway. (One brewer texted me later: funny how after all the brewers said the beers don't really cost less to make, the drinkers all said they should
cost less anyway.)
(Or maybe not: see the comments below, and my apologies to Andy: it was a bit fevered and multi-threaded!) Why, I asked,
what are you getting less of if it's a good, flavorful session beer? Alcohol? In which case...
why are you drinking, again?
The
English folks in attendance (and those who have experience with English beer prices) know that the
alcohol level has a clear link to increased price: that's how
their taxes are set. But that's not the case in the U.S., and it's not even the case in mainstream beer pricing: Bud Select 55 is 2.4% ABV, and it sells for the
same price at the bar as Miller Lite -- 4.2%.
Every time the discussion would
flag, I'd toss something in. "How much do you pay for Taras Boulba?", the session-strength Belgian beauty from De La Senne, that goes for around $10. And they were off again.
Some interesting points did come up. I suggested that bars should
charge a premium for cask, which upset some: it's hard enough to sell already, was the general tenor,
don't make it harder (to which I'd reply, you have to give the publican something for all the extra work!). Andy made a good point: if you're charging "normal" prices for a beer you can and want to drink more of over a longer time, well,
that adds up fast.
And
both he and the Alströms were citing
high prices in the area already; they wanted relief. I felt their
pain: I'm still wincing about paying
$10 for a pint of Cain's bitter at
Dandelion last month. But that made me think of something smart people say about the "underage drinking problem," both here and elsewhere in the world: we don't have an
underage drinking problem, we have a
drinking problem. You don't have a
session beer pricing problem; you have a
beer pricing problem. Which is what they've been saying for quite a while; the session beer cost issue is, like I said, just a hope for some kind of relief.
I don't see that coming, and it's got nothing to do with
session beer. When demand continues to be high -- and everyone knows that craft beer sales are still up, and growing -- and
price increases seem to have no effect on it, let alone any effect from the worst economy in 70 years...I don't see anyone
dropping prices. And piss you off or not, higher prices
reassure the craft novice that this stuff really is good. After all, like I said: you don't think a case of Corona costs $28 because of
cost of materials, do you? Price is part of the marketing equation, and it works. It's not lucky for those of us who already
know the stuff is good, but there you are.
As
Chris Lohring tweeted later that evening: "After a heated debate @ on price, taste and ABV,
selling the hell out of Notch at 8.99 a six pack at an in-store tasting." The people have spoken. For the record, I was drinking the new Notch Pilsner at Deep Ellum the day before. And it was delicious.
It was a great afternoon, and a great talk. Afterwards I went to
The Burren with Andy, The Brothers, Dann and Martha Paquette, Jaime Schier from Harpoon, Max Toste, and some other people (whose names I've clearly forgotten, and I apologize), and we all had some superlative Guinness. We talked some more trash, but mostly just talked. I think the Goose Island thing came up, and the Bourdain/Brew Masters thing, but mostly? Just breezin'. Perfect session stuff.
The first thing I'm going to say about Notch's new beer is this: you can, if you want, skip reading this post and just go straight to what Chris Lohring has to say about Left of The Dial IPA right here. Because he nails the whole "session IPA" discussion, and explains why he brewed this beer, and what it is and what it means, much better than I could.
